GOVERNMENT
OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT
OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
RAJYA SABHA
UNSTARRED
QUESTION NO. 2640
TO BE
ANSWERED ON DECEMBER 22, 2015/PAUSHA 1, 1937 (SAKA)
RECOMMENDATIONS OF SEVENTH PAY COMMISSION ON
NPS
2640. SHRIMATI WANSUK SYIEM:
Will the Minister of FINANCE be pleased to state:
(a) whether
the Seventh Pay Commission has recommended that withdrawals under the National
Pension System (NPS) should be tax exempt to place the pension system at par
with other similar schemes, as also the service tax levied at the time of
annuity purchase by NPS subscribers;
(b) whether
the Commission has come down heavily upon callous implementation of the NPS
over the years with State Governments depositing contributions (deductions) of
employees for eight years in lump sum without any returns or own contributions;
and
(c) if
so, the Government's comments thereon ?
ANSWER
The Minister
of State in the Ministry of Finance
(SHRI JAYANT
SINHA)
(a): Yes,
the Seventh Pay Commission has recommended, inter alia, that withdrawals under
the National Pension System (NPS) should be tax-exempt to place NPS at par with
other pension schemes. The Commission has also recommended that the service tax
levied at the time of annuity purchase by NPS subscribers should be exempted.
(b) and (c): The Seventh Central Pay Commission has
commented on NPS implementation for All India Service (AIS) officers, stating
that in the case of AIS officers, some states are yet to release counterpart
contributions or pay interest on delayed contributions. The Commission has,
therefore, recommended that Central Governments and State Governments should,
in a time bound manner, ensure that all the due contribution along with
compounded interest, where contributions have been delayed, be deposited in the
accounts of the beneficiaries. Advisories should be issued to the State
Governments to deposit amounts, if not already done, in respect of NPS
beneficiaries belonging to All India Services.
However, the statement,
that State Governments have deposited contributions (deductions) of employees
for eight years together without any returns or own contributions, cannot be
generalised. The State Governments have paid interest and also transmitted own
contributions in case of AIS officers. Even the States of West Bengal and
Tripura, which are yet to implement NPS in respect of State Government
employees, are discharging functions related to NPS implementation for AIS
officers posted in these two States. The State of Tamil Nadu, however, has yet
to adopt NPS architecture for both State Government employees and AIS officers.
After the establishment
of NPS architecture, PFRDA has been sensitising all State Governments about
timely remittance of NPS contributions and interest on delayed remittances.
States were also informed to sensitise the nodal offices to adhere to the
various guidelines. PFRDA constantly interacts with officials of Central
Ministries and State Government through letters, meetings, workshop and
conferences.
PFRDA has notified
various Regulations and one of these is PFRDA (Redressal of Subscriber
Grievance) Regulations, 2015. PFRDA has issued advisories to all State
Governments to streamline and automate various NPS activities. NPS has a
centralised grievance management system, where subscriber can lodge grievances
and may also be guided by above mentioned regulation. PFRDA has also written
letters to all State Governments to frame timelines for various NPS related
activities and some of the States have already framed the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment